VA New Jersey Health Care System vs Cassia Regional Medical Center vs Silver Lake Hospital LTACH vs VA New Jersey Health Care System
Side by side on Medicare (CMS) ratings, patient survey results, ER times, infections, readmissions and more.
| 4 hospitals | VA New Jersey Health Care System East Orange, NJ ✕ Remove | Cassia Regional Medical Center Burley, ID ✕ Remove | Silver Lake Hospital LTACH Newark, NJ ✕ Remove | VA New Jersey Health Care System East Orange, NJ ✕ Remove |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Location | East Orange, NJ | Burley, ID | Newark, NJ | East Orange, NJ |
| Hospital type | Critical Access | Long-term | VA | |
| Ownership | Voluntary Non-Profit - Private | Voluntary Non-Profit - Church | Veterans Health Administration | |
| Emergency room | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Ratings | ||||
| CMS overall star ratingMedicare's summary of quality measures | – | 3 of 5 | – | 2 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingHCAHPS summary star rating | – | 4 of 5 | – | 3 of 5 |
| Would definitely recommend | – | 67% of patients | – | 66% of patients |
| Nurse communicationPatient survey stars | – | 4 of 5 | – | 3 of 5 |
| Doctor communicationPatient survey stars | – | 4 of 5 | – | 4 of 5 |
| Communication about medicinesPatient survey stars | – | 4 of 5 | – | 3 of 5 |
| Discharge informationPatient survey stars | – | 4 of 5 | – | 3 of 5 |
| CleanlinessPatient survey stars | – | 4 of 5 | – | 3 of 5 |
| Quiet at nightPatient survey stars | – | 4 of 5 | – | 3 of 5 |
| Overall hospital ratingPatient survey stars | – | 4 of 5 | – | 3 of 5 |
| Would recommendPatient survey stars | – | 4 of 5 | – | 3 of 5 |
| Google rating | 3.0 of 5 (146 reviews) | 4.0 of 5 (125 reviews) | – | – |
| Emergency room | ||||
| Typical ER visitMedian minutes, patients sent home | – | 2 hr | – | – |
| Left before being seen | – | 1% | – | 1% |
| ER volume | – | Low | – | Low |
| Safety | ||||
| Hospital-acquired infectionsCompared with national | – | 0 better · 0 worse of 1 compared | – | 0 better · 0 worse of 2 compared |
| Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) | – | – | – | Same as national |
| Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) | – | – | – | Same as national |
| C. diff intestinal infections | – | Same as national | – | – |
| Serious complications (PSI 90) | – | – | – | Same as national |
| Death rate: Heart attack patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted | – | – | – | 10.6% |
| Death rate: Heart failure patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted | – | 12.3% | – | 7.5% |
| Death rate: Pneumonia patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted | – | 16.5% | – | 11.9% |
| Death rate: COPD patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted | – | – | – | 6.2% |
| Death rate: Hospital-wide, all conditionsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted | – | 4.4% | – | 3.3% |
| Readmissions | ||||
| Readmitted: Heart failureWithin 30 days | – | 21.8% | – | 24.3% |
| Readmitted: PneumoniaWithin 30 days | – | 16.6% | – | 17.8% |
| Readmitted: COPD (chronic lung disease)Within 30 days | – | – | – | 19.5% |
| Extra days back in hospital after heart failure | – | +27.5 | – | +78 |
| Extra days back in hospital after pneumonia | – | -27.6 | – | +7.4 |
| Hospital visits within 7 days of an outpatient colonoscopy | – | 13.9 Same as national | – | – |
| Hospital visits after outpatient surgery | – | 1.00 As expected | – | – |
| Timely care | ||||
| Sepsis: got all recommended early treatmentHigher is better | – | 57% | – | 57% |
| Septic shock: full treatment within 3 hoursHigher is better | – | 64% | – | – |
| Typical time in the ER before going homeLower is better | – | 120 min | – | – |
| Typical ER time for mental health patients sent homeLower is better | – | 250 min | – | – |
| Typical ER time for patients transferred to another facilityLower is better | – | 244 min | – | – |
| Patients who left the ER before being seenLower is better | – | 1% | – | 1% |
| Health care workers vaccinated against fluHigher is better | – | 93% | – | 65% |
| Discharged on two opioids, or an opioid and a benzodiazepineLower is better | – | 13% | – | – |
| Colonoscopy: right follow-up interval for average-risk patientsHigher is better | – | 98% | – | 69% |
| Blood clot prevention givenHigher is better | – | – | – | 87% |
| Blood clot prevention given in intensive careHigher is better | – | 100% | – | 86% |
| Maternity | ||||
| Maternity safety practices (CMS SM-7) | – | Yes | – | – |
| Birthing-friendly designation | – | Yes | – | – |
"Better" or "worse" means CMS found a statistically significant difference from the national rate. Figures without a verdict are shown for context; small differences may be chance. A dash means CMS has no result for that hospital, often because it treats too few patients for that measure. About the data.
How to compare hospitals
Start with the CMS overall star rating, which rolls up deaths, safety, readmissions, patient experience and timely care. Then look at the measures that matter for your situation: infection and complication results before surgery, maternity measures if you're expecting, and ER times for emergencies.
Most hospitals are "no different from national" on most measures. A single "worse" result covers one measure over a past period; ask the hospital about it rather than ruling it out. In an emergency, go to the nearest emergency room or call 911.