facebook tracking Compare City of Hope Cancer Center Phoenix vs Southeastern Regional Medical Center, INC vs Copper Springs East- Gilbert

City of Hope Cancer Center Phoenix vs Southeastern Regional Medical Center, INC vs Copper Springs East- Gilbert

Side by side on Medicare (CMS) ratings, patient survey results, ER times, infections, readmissions and more.

Hospital comparison: City of Hope Cancer Center Phoenix, Southeastern Regional Medical Center, INC and Copper Springs East- Gilbert
3 hospitals City of Hope Cancer Center Phoenix Goodyear, AZ ✕ Remove Southeastern Regional Medical Center, INC Newnan, GA ✕ Remove Copper Springs East- Gilbert Avondale, AZ ✕ Remove
Overview
Location Goodyear, AZ Newnan, GA Avondale, AZ
Hospital type Acute care Acute care Psychiatric
Ownership Proprietary Proprietary Proprietary
Emergency room No No Yes
Ratings
CMS overall star ratingMedicare's summary of quality measures 4 of 5 5 of 5 –
Patient survey ratingHCAHPS summary star rating 4 of 5 5 of 5 –
Would definitely recommend 86% of patients 92% of patients –
Nurse communicationPatient survey stars 5 of 5 5 of 5 –
Doctor communicationPatient survey stars 4 of 5 4 of 5 –
Communication about medicinesPatient survey stars 4 of 5 4 of 5 –
Discharge informationPatient survey stars 4 of 5 5 of 5 –
CleanlinessPatient survey stars 5 of 5 5 of 5 –
Quiet at nightPatient survey stars 4 of 5 5 of 5 –
Overall hospital ratingPatient survey stars 4 of 5 5 of 5 –
Would recommendPatient survey stars 5 of 5 5 of 5 –
Safety
Hospital-acquired infectionsCompared with national 0 better · 0 worse of 2 compared 0 better · 0 worse of 3 compared –
Surgical site infections after colon surgery Same as national Same as national –
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy – Same as national –
C. diff intestinal infections Same as national Same as national –
Serious complications (PSI 90) Same as national Same as national –
Death rate: Hospital-wide, all conditionsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted 3.6% 4.0% –
Readmissions
Hospital visits within 7 days of an outpatient colonoscopy 13.5
Same as national
13.2
Same as national
–
Chemotherapy patients admitted to hospital 8.6
Same as national
7.9
Better than national
–
Chemotherapy patients visiting the ER 5
Same as national
5
Same as national
–
Hospital visits after outpatient surgery 0.90
As expected
0.90
As expected
–
Timely care
Sepsis: got all recommended early treatmentHigher is better 80% 79% –
Septic shock: full treatment within 3 hoursHigher is better 100% 82% –
Health care workers vaccinated against fluHigher is better 90% 84% –
Discharged on two opioids, or an opioid and a benzodiazepineLower is better 21% 8% –
Colonoscopy: right follow-up interval for average-risk patientsHigher is better – 90% –
Blood clot prevention givenHigher is better 89% 97% –
Blood clot prevention given in intensive careHigher is better – 99% –
Medicare programs
Hospital-acquired condition penalty1% payment cut this year Not penalized Not penalized –
Value-based purchasing scoreOut of 100; median 29.5 62.3 47.1 –
Medicare spending per patient1.00 = national median 1.09 1.08 –

"Better" or "worse" means CMS found a statistically significant difference from the national rate. Figures without a verdict are shown for context; small differences may be chance. A dash means CMS has no result for that hospital, often because it treats too few patients for that measure. About the data.

Advertisement

How to compare hospitals

Start with the CMS overall star rating, which rolls up deaths, safety, readmissions, patient experience and timely care. Then look at the measures that matter for your situation: infection and complication results before surgery, maternity measures if you're expecting, and ER times for emergencies.

Most hospitals are "no different from national" on most measures. A single "worse" result covers one measure over a past period; ask the hospital about it rather than ruling it out. In an emergency, go to the nearest emergency room or call 911.