facebook tracking Compare Cjw Medical Center vs Hiram W Davis Medical Center vs Healthsouth Rehab Hosp of VA

Cjw Medical Center vs Hiram W Davis Medical Center vs Healthsouth Rehab Hosp of VA

Side by side on Medicare (CMS) ratings, patient survey results, ER times, infections, readmissions and more.

Hospital comparison: Cjw Medical Center, Hiram W Davis Medical Center and Healthsouth Rehab Hosp of VA
3 hospitals Cjw Medical Center Richmond, VA ✕ Remove Hiram W Davis Medical Center Petersburg, VA ✕ Remove Healthsouth Rehab Hosp of VA Richmond, VA ✕ Remove
Overview
Location Richmond, VA Petersburg, VA Richmond, VA
Hospital type Acute care Acute care Rehabilitation
Ownership Proprietary Government - State Proprietary
Emergency room Yes No –
Beds 748 345 40
Ratings
CMS overall star ratingMedicare's summary of quality measures 4 of 5 – –
Patient survey ratingHCAHPS summary star rating 2 of 5 – –
Would definitely recommend 64% of patients – –
Nurse communicationPatient survey stars 2 of 5 – –
Doctor communicationPatient survey stars 2 of 5 – –
Communication about medicinesPatient survey stars 2 of 5 – –
Discharge informationPatient survey stars 2 of 5 – –
CleanlinessPatient survey stars 3 of 5 – –
Quiet at nightPatient survey stars 2 of 5 – –
Overall hospital ratingPatient survey stars 2 of 5 – –
Would recommendPatient survey stars 3 of 5 – –
Emergency room
Typical ER visitMedian minutes, patients sent home 2 hr 47 min – –
Left before being seen 1% – –
ER volume Very High – –
Safety
Hospital-acquired infectionsCompared with national 5 better · 0 worse of 6 compared – –
Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) Better than national – –
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) Better than national – –
Surgical site infections after colon surgery Better than national – –
Surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy Same as national – –
MRSA bloodstream infections Better than national – –
C. diff intestinal infections Better than national – –
Serious complications (PSI 90) Same as national – –
Death rate: Heart attack patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted 11.5% – –
Death rate: Heart failure patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted 10.2% – –
Death rate: Pneumonia patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted 16.2% – –
Death rate: Stroke patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted 14.1% – –
Death rate: COPD patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted 7.7% – –
Death rate: Coronary bypass (CABG) surgery patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted 1.8% – –
Death rate: Hospital-wide, all conditionsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted 3.9% – –
Readmissions
Readmitted: Heart attackWithin 30 days 14.5% – –
Readmitted: Heart failureWithin 30 days 20.5% – –
Readmitted: PneumoniaWithin 30 days 18.1% – –
Readmitted: COPD (chronic lung disease)Within 30 days 19.2% – –
Readmitted: Heart bypass surgery (CABG)Within 30 days 10.0% – –
Readmitted: Hip or knee replacementWithin 30 days 5.5% – –
Extra days back in hospital after heart attack +9.6 – –
Extra days back in hospital after heart failure -7.3 – –
Extra days back in hospital after pneumonia -0.2 – –
Hospital visits within 7 days of an outpatient colonoscopy 13.1
Same as national
– –
Hospital visits after outpatient surgery 1.40
Worse than expected
– –
Timely care
Sepsis: got all recommended early treatmentHigher is better 63% – –
Septic shock: full treatment within 3 hoursHigher is better 63% – –
Stroke: brain scan read within 45 minutes of ER arrivalHigher is better 86% – –
Heart attack (STEMI): timely clot-busting or artery-opening careHigher is better 0% – –
Typical time in the ER before going homeLower is better 167 min – –
Typical ER time for mental health patients sent homeLower is better 247 min – –
Patients who left the ER before being seenLower is better 1% – –
Health care workers vaccinated against fluHigher is better 74% 66% –
Discharged on two opioids, or an opioid and a benzodiazepineLower is better 13% – –
Colonoscopy: right follow-up interval for average-risk patientsHigher is better 93% – –
Blood clot prevention givenHigher is better 93% – –
Blood clot prevention given in intensive careHigher is better 97% – –
Stroke: clot prevention started by day 2Higher is better 93% – –
Maternity
Maternity safety practices (CMS SM-7) No – –
Medicare programs
Hospital-acquired condition penalty1% payment cut this year Not penalized Not penalized –
Value-based purchasing scoreOut of 100; median 29.5 26.3 – –
Medicare spending per patient1.00 = national median 1.01 – –

"Better" or "worse" means CMS found a statistically significant difference from the national rate. Figures without a verdict are shown for context; small differences may be chance. A dash means CMS has no result for that hospital, often because it treats too few patients for that measure. About the data.

Advertisement

How to compare hospitals

Start with the CMS overall star rating, which rolls up deaths, safety, readmissions, patient experience and timely care. Then look at the measures that matter for your situation: infection and complication results before surgery, maternity measures if you're expecting, and ER times for emergencies.

Most hospitals are "no different from national" on most measures. A single "worse" result covers one measure over a past period; ask the hospital about it rather than ruling it out. In an emergency, go to the nearest emergency room or call 911.