Animas Surgical Hospital, LLC vs Lubbock Heart Hospital Lp vs Northern Navajo Medical Center
Side by side on Medicare (CMS) ratings, patient survey results, ER times, infections, readmissions and more.
| 3 hospitals | Animas Surgical Hospital, LLC Durango, CO ✕ Remove | Lubbock Heart Hospital Lp Lubbock, TX ✕ Remove | Northern Navajo Medical Center Shiprock, NM ✕ Remove |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | |||
| Location | Durango, CO | Lubbock, TX | Shiprock, NM |
| Hospital type | Acute care | Acute care | Acute care |
| Ownership | Physician | Government - Hospital District Or Authority | Government - Federal |
| Emergency room | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Beds | – | – | 59 |
| Ratings | |||
| CMS overall star ratingMedicare's summary of quality measures | – | 2 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingHCAHPS summary star rating | 5 of 5 | 4 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Would definitely recommend | 93% of patients | 81% of patients | 56% of patients |
| Nurse communicationPatient survey stars | 5 of 5 | 4 of 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Doctor communicationPatient survey stars | 5 of 5 | 4 of 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Communication about medicinesPatient survey stars | 4 of 5 | 2 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Discharge informationPatient survey stars | 4 of 5 | 3 of 5 | 2 of 5 |
| CleanlinessPatient survey stars | 5 of 5 | 3 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Quiet at nightPatient survey stars | 3 of 5 | 4 of 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Overall hospital ratingPatient survey stars | 5 of 5 | 4 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Would recommendPatient survey stars | 5 of 5 | 5 of 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Google rating | 4.0 of 5 (26 reviews) | 3.0 of 5 (65 reviews) | 3.0 of 5 (41 reviews) |
| Emergency room | |||
| Typical ER visitMedian minutes, patients sent home | 1 hr 39 min | 2 hr 39 min | – |
| Left before being seen | 1% | 0% | – |
| ER volume | Low | Low | – |
| Safety | |||
| Hospital-acquired infectionsCompared with national | – | 0 better · 0 worse of 1 compared | 0 better · 0 worse of 1 compared |
| C. diff intestinal infections | – | Same as national | Same as national |
| Serious complications (PSI 90) | Same as national | Same as national | Same as national |
| Death rate: Heart attack patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted | – | 11.7% | – |
| Death rate: Heart failure patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted | – | 14.4% | 11.6% |
| Death rate: Pneumonia patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted | – | 14.6% | 20.0% |
| Death rate: COPD patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted | – | 9.4% | – |
| Death rate: Coronary bypass (CABG) surgery patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted | – | 2.7% | – |
| Death rate: Hospital-wide, all conditionsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted | 3.9% | 4.8% | 4.5% |
| Readmissions | |||
| Readmitted: Heart attackWithin 30 days | – | 13.3% | – |
| Readmitted: Heart failureWithin 30 days | – | 21.5% | – |
| Readmitted: PneumoniaWithin 30 days | – | 16.9% | 17.0% |
| Readmitted: COPD (chronic lung disease)Within 30 days | – | 18.9% | – |
| Readmitted: Heart bypass surgery (CABG)Within 30 days | – | 10.6% | – |
| Extra days back in hospital after heart attack | – | +15.5 | – |
| Extra days back in hospital after heart failure | – | +23.6 | +44.5 |
| Extra days back in hospital after pneumonia | – | +1.9 | -7.4 |
| Hospital visits within 7 days of an outpatient colonoscopy | – | 13.9 Same as national | – |
| Hospital visits after outpatient surgery | 1.20 As expected | 1.00 As expected | – |
| Timely care | |||
| Sepsis: got all recommended early treatmentHigher is better | – | 50% | 59% |
| Septic shock: full treatment within 3 hoursHigher is better | – | – | 99% |
| Typical time in the ER before going homeLower is better | 99 min | 159 min | – |
| Typical ER time for patients transferred to another facilityLower is better | – | 218 min | – |
| Patients who left the ER before being seenLower is better | 1% | 0% | – |
| Health care workers vaccinated against fluHigher is better | 95% | 80% | 93% |
| Discharged on two opioids, or an opioid and a benzodiazepineLower is better | 4% | 15% | 4% |
| Colonoscopy: right follow-up interval for average-risk patientsHigher is better | – | 91% | – |
| Cataract surgery: vision better within 90 daysHigher is better | – | 99% | – |
| Blood clot prevention givenHigher is better | – | – | 47% |
| Blood clot prevention given in intensive careHigher is better | – | 90% | – |
| Maternity | |||
| Maternity safety practices (CMS SM-7) | – | – | No |
| Medicare programs | |||
| Hospital-acquired condition penalty1% payment cut this year | Not penalized | Not penalized | Not penalized |
| Value-based purchasing scoreOut of 100; median 29.5 | – | 41.3 | 31.5 |
| Medicare spending per patient1.00 = national median | 0.76 | 1.09 | 0.94 |
"Better" or "worse" means CMS found a statistically significant difference from the national rate. Figures without a verdict are shown for context; small differences may be chance. A dash means CMS has no result for that hospital, often because it treats too few patients for that measure. About the data.
How to compare hospitals
Start with the CMS overall star rating, which rolls up deaths, safety, readmissions, patient experience and timely care. Then look at the measures that matter for your situation: infection and complication results before surgery, maternity measures if you're expecting, and ER times for emergencies.
Most hospitals are "no different from national" on most measures. A single "worse" result covers one measure over a past period; ask the hospital about it rather than ruling it out. In an emergency, go to the nearest emergency room or call 911.