Olympia Medical Center vs Wellspring Foundation vs Kaiser Foundation Hospital - los Angeles vs Kaiser Foundation Hospital - West la
Side by side on Medicare (CMS) ratings, patient survey results, ER times, infections, readmissions and more.
| 4 hospitals | Olympia Medical Center Los Angeles, CA ✕ Remove | Wellspring Foundation Bethlehem, CT ✕ Remove | Kaiser Foundation Hospital - los Angeles Los Angeles, CA ✕ Remove | Kaiser Foundation Hospital - West la Los Angeles, CA ✕ Remove |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||||
| Location | Los Angeles, CA | Bethlehem, CT | Los Angeles, CA | Los Angeles, CA |
| Hospital type | Acute care | Acute care | Acute care | |
| Ownership | Proprietary | Voluntary Non-Profit - Other | Voluntary Non-Profit - Private | |
| Emergency room | Yes | – | Yes | Yes |
| Beds | – | 36 | 160 | 196 |
| Ratings | ||||
| CMS overall star ratingMedicare's summary of quality measures | – | – | 5 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingHCAHPS summary star rating | – | – | 3 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Would definitely recommend | – | – | 74% of patients | 73% of patients |
| Nurse communicationPatient survey stars | – | – | 3 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Doctor communicationPatient survey stars | – | – | 3 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Communication about medicinesPatient survey stars | – | – | 3 of 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Discharge informationPatient survey stars | – | – | 3 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| CleanlinessPatient survey stars | – | – | 4 of 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Quiet at nightPatient survey stars | – | – | 3 of 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Overall hospital ratingPatient survey stars | – | – | 4 of 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Would recommendPatient survey stars | – | – | 4 of 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Google rating | 3.0 of 5 (95 reviews) | 3.0 of 5 (10 reviews) | 4.0 of 5 (481 reviews) | 4.0 of 5 (403 reviews) |
| Safety | ||||
| Hospital-acquired infectionsCompared with national | – | – | 2 better · 0 worse of 5 compared | 1 better · 0 worse of 5 compared |
| Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) | – | – | Same as national | Same as national |
| Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) | – | – | Same as national | Same as national |
| Surgical site infections after colon surgery | – | – | Same as national | Same as national |
| MRSA bloodstream infections | – | – | Better than national | Same as national |
| C. diff intestinal infections | – | – | Better than national | Better than national |
| Serious complications (PSI 90) | – | – | Same as national | Same as national |
| Death rate: Heart failure patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted | – | – | 10.3% | 9.2% |
| Death rate: Pneumonia patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted | – | – | 17.5% | 15.6% |
| Death rate: Stroke patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted | – | – | 10.7% | 15.1% |
| Death rate: Hospital-wide, all conditionsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted | – | – | 3.5% | 4.3% |
| Readmissions | ||||
| Readmitted: Heart attackWithin 30 days | – | – | 12.6% | 14.3% |
| Readmitted: Heart failureWithin 30 days | – | – | 22.0% | 21.6% |
| Readmitted: PneumoniaWithin 30 days | – | – | 18.4% | 18.5% |
| Readmitted: COPD (chronic lung disease)Within 30 days | – | – | 19.2% | 21.3% |
| Readmitted: Heart bypass surgery (CABG)Within 30 days | – | – | 10.1% | – |
| Readmitted: Hip or knee replacementWithin 30 days | – | – | 5.3% | – |
| Extra days back in hospital after heart failure | – | – | -23.7 | +84.9 |
| Extra days back in hospital after pneumonia | – | – | +57.7 | +45 |
| Timely care | ||||
| Sepsis: got all recommended early treatmentHigher is better | – | – | 80% | 75% |
| Septic shock: full treatment within 3 hoursHigher is better | – | – | 86% | 80% |
| Health care workers vaccinated against fluHigher is better | – | – | 70% | 54% |
| Discharged on two opioids, or an opioid and a benzodiazepineLower is better | – | – | 7% | 10% |
| Stroke: discharged on clot-prevention medicineHigher is better | – | – | 88% | 88% |
| Stroke with atrial fibrillation: discharged on a blood thinnerHigher is better | – | – | 73% | 80% |
| Maternity | ||||
| Maternity safety practices (CMS SM-7) | – | – | Yes | Yes |
| Birthing-friendly designation | – | – | Yes | Yes |
| Medicare programs | ||||
| Hospital-acquired condition penalty1% payment cut this year | – | – | Not penalized | Not penalized |
| Value-based purchasing scoreOut of 100; median 29.5 | – | – | 47.4 | 27.3 |
| Medicare spending per patient1.00 = national median | – | – | 0.90 | 1.02 |
"Better" or "worse" means CMS found a statistically significant difference from the national rate. Figures without a verdict are shown for context; small differences may be chance. A dash means CMS has no result for that hospital, often because it treats too few patients for that measure. About the data.
How to compare hospitals
Start with the CMS overall star rating, which rolls up deaths, safety, readmissions, patient experience and timely care. Then look at the measures that matter for your situation: infection and complication results before surgery, maternity measures if you're expecting, and ER times for emergencies.
Most hospitals are "no different from national" on most measures. A single "worse" result covers one measure over a past period; ask the hospital about it rather than ruling it out. In an emergency, go to the nearest emergency room or call 911.