facebook tracking Compare Lubbock Heart Hospital Lp vs Covenant Medical Center

Lubbock Heart Hospital Lp vs Covenant Medical Center

Side by side on Medicare (CMS) ratings, patient survey results, ER times, infections, readmissions and more.

Hospital comparison: Lubbock Heart Hospital Lp and Covenant Medical Center
2 hospitals Lubbock Heart Hospital Lp Lubbock, TX ✕ Remove Covenant Medical Center Lubbock, TX ✕ Remove
Overview
Location Lubbock, TX Lubbock, TX
Hospital type Acute care Acute care
Ownership Government - Hospital District Or Authority Voluntary Non-Profit - Private
Emergency room Yes Yes
Beds – 410
Ratings
CMS overall star ratingMedicare's summary of quality measures 2 of 5 3 of 5
Patient survey ratingHCAHPS summary star rating 4 of 5 3 of 5
Would definitely recommend 81% of patients 70% of patients
Nurse communicationPatient survey stars 4 of 5 3 of 5
Doctor communicationPatient survey stars 4 of 5 3 of 5
Communication about medicinesPatient survey stars 2 of 5 2 of 5
Discharge informationPatient survey stars 3 of 5 3 of 5
CleanlinessPatient survey stars 3 of 5 2 of 5
Quiet at nightPatient survey stars 4 of 5 3 of 5
Overall hospital ratingPatient survey stars 4 of 5 3 of 5
Would recommendPatient survey stars 5 of 5 4 of 5
Google rating 3.0 of 5 (65 reviews) 4.0 of 5 (102 reviews)
Emergency room
Typical ER visitMedian minutes, patients sent home 2 hr 39 min 2 hr 44 min
Left before being seen 0% 7%
ER volume Low Very High
Safety
Hospital-acquired infectionsCompared with national 0 better · 0 worse of 1 compared 4 better · 1 worse of 5 compared
Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) – Better than national
Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) – Better than national
Surgical site infections after colon surgery – Worse than national
MRSA bloodstream infections – Better than national
C. diff intestinal infections Same as national Better than national
Serious complications (PSI 90) Same as national Same as national
Death rate: Heart attack patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted 11.7% 13.3%
Death rate: Heart failure patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted 14.4% 9.7%
Death rate: Pneumonia patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted 14.6% 15.2%
Death rate: Stroke patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted – 10.3%
Death rate: COPD patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted 9.4% 13.0%
Death rate: Coronary bypass (CABG) surgery patientsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted 2.7% 2.4%
Death rate: Hospital-wide, all conditionsWithin 30 days, risk-adjusted 4.8% 3.8%
Readmissions
Readmitted: Heart attackWithin 30 days 13.3% 15.0%
Readmitted: Heart failureWithin 30 days 21.5% 20.2%
Readmitted: PneumoniaWithin 30 days 16.9% 17.7%
Readmitted: COPD (chronic lung disease)Within 30 days 18.9% 21.1%
Readmitted: Heart bypass surgery (CABG)Within 30 days 10.6% 12.2%
Extra days back in hospital after heart attack +15.5 -15.9
Extra days back in hospital after heart failure +23.6 -12.1
Extra days back in hospital after pneumonia +1.9 +22.3
Hospital visits within 7 days of an outpatient colonoscopy 13.9
Same as national
12.5
Same as national
Hospital visits after outpatient surgery 1.00
As expected
1.10
As expected
Timely care
Sepsis: got all recommended early treatmentHigher is better 50% 64%
Septic shock: full treatment within 3 hoursHigher is better – 86%
Stroke: brain scan read within 45 minutes of ER arrivalHigher is better – 64%
Heart attack (STEMI): timely clot-busting or artery-opening careHigher is better – 59%
Typical time in the ER before going homeLower is better 159 min 164 min
Typical ER time for patients transferred to another facilityLower is better 218 min –
Patients who left the ER before being seenLower is better 0% 7%
Health care workers vaccinated against fluHigher is better 80% 56%
Discharged on two opioids, or an opioid and a benzodiazepineLower is better 15% 19%
Colonoscopy: right follow-up interval for average-risk patientsHigher is better 91% 83%
Cataract surgery: vision better within 90 daysHigher is better 99% –
Blood clot prevention given in intensive careHigher is better 90% –
Stroke: discharged on clot-prevention medicineHigher is better – 97%
Medicare programs
Hospital-acquired condition penalty1% payment cut this year Not penalized Not penalized
Value-based purchasing scoreOut of 100; median 29.5 41.3 18.7
Medicare spending per patient1.00 = national median 1.09 1.13

"Better" or "worse" means CMS found a statistically significant difference from the national rate. Figures without a verdict are shown for context; small differences may be chance. A dash means CMS has no result for that hospital, often because it treats too few patients for that measure. About the data.

Advertisement

How to compare hospitals

Start with the CMS overall star rating, which rolls up deaths, safety, readmissions, patient experience and timely care. Then look at the measures that matter for your situation: infection and complication results before surgery, maternity measures if you're expecting, and ER times for emergencies.

Most hospitals are "no different from national" on most measures. A single "worse" result covers one measure over a past period; ask the hospital about it rather than ruling it out. In an emergency, go to the nearest emergency room or call 911.